01
Review and QA
How to Build a Review and QA Workflow
This guide turns quality from informal comments into a repeatable path with review gates, issue types, rework routing, and delivery readiness.
8分reviewQAissue tracking
Define review gates before scale increases
Teams usually feel quality pain only after output volume rises. Review gates should exist before the team depends on speed.
Separate annotation completion from review approval.
Decide who can approve, reject, or escalate.
Use one visible state model for pending, approved, and rework tasks.
Turn issues into reusable quality signals
If all review feedback stays in comments, the team cannot learn which mistake types keep returning.
Split missed labels, wrong class, boundary, and formatting issues.
Use severity or risk level where it changes release decisions.
Keep issue labels consistent so QA summaries stay useful.
Route rework back with clear ownership
Quality improves when rejected work returns with scope, reason, and owner, not just a generic “fix this” message.
02
Route the work back to the responsible member or queue.
03
Review the returned submission again before version freeze or release.
04
Expose blocker and QA status in project and delivery views.
FAQ
Is QA the same as review? Not exactly. Review is the action, QA is the operating system around rules, issue patterns, rework, and release readiness.
Should every reject create an issue? For team-scale delivery, yes. Otherwise the rework path and later QA summary become hard to trust.
次に学ぶおすすめ
初めてなら、まず注釈とエクスポートのガイドから始めてください。
チーム workflow を準備しているなら、コラボレーションとプラン選択ガイドへ進んでください。
workflow 全体を理解したいなら、その次に OpenClaw と学習ガイドへ進んでください。